Pursuing economical, power mio 125 blue cores sacrificed?

We certainly know that pursue and get a lot of things at the same time would be difficult to do. And usually get as much as possible what we can get while sacrificing something very difficult to remove but it must be done.

So is the case of a product. It is unlikely we will get the product that is 100% as we want. Because all there is compensation.

Blue core vs economical esp where?

Trying to analyze mio 125 blue cores through the figure of the Vietnam Yamaha Nozza possibility is the blue core 125 mio Indonesia, to be honest I was a little frown, its power under the Honda Beat Unsurprisingly cubication smaller.

Merk	Yamaha MioJ 113	Yamaha Nozza Grande 125	Honda Beat 110 FI
Power	5,7 KW ( 7,75 PS ) @5000 rpm	6,0 Kw (8,2 ps) @ 6.500 rpm	6.27 kW (8,52 PS) / 8.000 rpm
Torsi	8,5 Nm @5000 rpm	9,7 Nm @ 5.000 rpm	8.68 N.m (0,89 kgf.m) / 6.500 rpm

Price mio 125 blue cores 14 millions?

After looking at the table above, I conclude that by getting power at lower rpm (@ 6500 rpm) and torque is greater (@ 9.7NM), pull the blue core matic first in Indonesia will be more run than the Honda Beat. Essentially slender legs combined with the power and torque at lower rpm obtained will contribute greatly to the level economical.

Then for its power? Obviously for the power, Honda Beat is superior, but the power is to be sought at a higher rpm propeller (@ 8000 rpm).

Reflecting the conclusions from the above data, the Yamaha seemed impressed more emphasis economical side and pull down that appears on the scooter although it may have to sacrifice power side.